4305 Clinical Case Series: Management of Fecal Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (IAD) Utilizing a Three Step Technique

Terri Noftsger, BSN, RN, WCC , Drake Center, Staff Nurse, Advanced Wound Care Team, Cincinnati, OH
Dawanda Campbell, LPN, WCC , Drake Center, Staff Nurse, Advanced Wound Care Team, Cincinnati, OH
Brenda Greene, STNA , Drake Center, Nursing Assistant, Advanced Wound Care Team, Cincinnati, OH
Mary Arnold-Long, MSN, RN, CRRN, CWOCN-AP, ACNS-BC , Drake Center, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Mason, OH
Problem:  Four patients with IAD were admitted for care at our long term acute care (LTAC) hospital.

Past Management:  Patient A was admitted 4/11 with extensive IAD related to liquid fecal incontinence related to Clostridium difficile colitis.  Patient A was anuric. Treatment at referring facility was trypsin and balsam peru ointment1.

Patient B was admitted 7/18 with IAD related to liquid fecal incontinence.  Patient B had an indwelling urinary catheter.  Treatment at referring facility was an unknown zinc oxide barrier ointment.

Patient C was admitted 8/11 with extensive IAD related to fecal incontinence.  Patient C had an indwelling urinary catheter and an unstageable sacral pressure ulcer.  Treatment at referring facility was unknown barrier ointment.

Patient D was admitted 8/27 with IAD related to fecal incontinence.  Treatment at referring facility was unknown.

Current Approach:  Patient A had fecal management device2 and initiation of a three step process utilizing ostomy powder3, non-alcohol skin sealant4, and barrier ointment5.  This was supplemented by trypsin and balsam peru ointment1.

Patient B had antifungal barrier ointment6 initiated 7/18.  On 7/22, the three step process using antifungal powder7 , non-alcohol skin sealant4, and antifungal barrier ointment6 was initiated.  An indwelling fecal management device was utilized to divert stool.  By 8/9 the fungal component of Patient B’s dermatitis had resolved and the three step process was continued using ostomy powder3 and standard barrier ointment5.

Patient C and Patient D had the three step process initiated using ostomy powder3, non-alcohol skin sealant4, and antifungal barrier ointment6.  Patient D also had an indwelling fecal management device utilized to divert stool.

Patient Outcomes:  Although Patient A’s IAD was so severe there were resultant full thickness wounds, consistent use of the three step process supplemented by tyrpsin & balsam peru ointment1 allowed complete epithelialization by 6/16 (2 months).  Patient A remained incontinent of stool and was transitioned to an external collection device8

Patient B had resolution of dermatitis by 8/17 (1 month) although his fecal incontinence persisted.  Patient C had significant improvement by 8/16 (5 days) and near resolution by 8/23 (12 days).  Patient D had significant improvement in 2 days and complete resolution by 9/20 (24 days).

Conclusion:  Consistent use of a three step process utilizing powder, skin sealant and barrier ointment can promote healing of IAD.

1Xenaderm (Healthpoint)

2Zassi (now ActiFlo) (Hollister, Inc.)

3Adapt Ostomy Powder (Hollister, Inc.)

4Cavilon No Sting (3M)

5Baza Protect (Coloplast)

6Baza Antifungal (Coloplast)

7Nystatin Powder

8Fecal Incontinence Collector (Hollister, Inc.)

See more of: Case Study
See more of: Case Study Abstract