The WOCN Society 40th Annual Conference (June 21-25th, 2008)


2423

Long Term Indwelling Catheters: An Rct of Catheter Flush Vs. Standard Care

Katherine Moore, PHD, RN, CCCN, University of Alberta, Associate Dean Graduate Studies/Adjunct Professor Division of Urology, 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Building Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada, Rosemary McGinnis, MN, RN, Calgary Health REgion, Nursing Practice Program Leader, Calgary, AB T6E 2B3, Canada, Mandy Fader, PhD, RN, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Reader, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, Kathryn Getliffe, PhD, RN, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Professor, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, Mikel Gray, PhD, RN, NP, University of Virginia, Professor, Department of urology, Charlottesville, VA, Lakshmi Puttagunta, MD, University of Alberta, Pathologist, Department of Pathology, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada, and Donald Voaklander, PhD, University of Alberta, Associate Professor, School of Public Health, Edmonton, AB T6E 2B3, Canada.

           

Background: Blockage of indwelling catheters in situ longer than 30 days is an ongoing management issue but evidence on amelioration is lacking.  In Canada, one strategy used by homecare nurses is saline catheter washouts; in the UK, another strategy is flushing with a commercially available catheter washout product consisting of citric acid 3.23%, light magnesium oxide 0.38%, sodium bicarbonate 0.7%, and disodium editate 0.01%.  Based on laboratory studies, it is believed that routine flushing with the sterile commercial solution prevents or reduces blockage events.  No randomized trials have been conducted to assess the product in the clinical care setting.  In this study, we  examined whether catheter washouts prevent catheter blockage.

Method: Multisite randomized controlled 3 group trial: control (usual care, no washout), saline washout, or commercial washout solution.  Adults with long term indwelling catheters with MMSE > 23 living in community, supportive, or continuing care were recruited.  At baseline visit, the catheter was changed followed by weekly home visits for 8 weeks, with checks for catheter patency, urine pH and catheter flush (depending on group assignment).  Endpoints were 8 weeks (completion date), three or more catheter changes in the 8 week period, or symptomatic urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics.

Results:  110 potential participants were screened; 74 were enrolled and randomized; 53 completed 8 weeks of data collection. Dropouts included 3 catheter changes or UTI (16), haematuria, latex sensitivity, deceased/severe illness, or personal choice. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis no statistical difference between the groups was found in time to first catheter change.

Conclusion/Implications: High attrition in the study means that current evidence remains insufficient to state whether catheter washout with saline or a commercially prepared product is more effective than usual care in preventing blocking.