The WOCN Society 40th Annual Conference (June 21-25th, 2008)


2444

Management of colostomy with a new 2-piece closed-end pouching system

Andrea Arnhold1, Kirsten Schröder2, Inge Riedlinger3, Ulla Prause4, Marion Welser5, Veronika Knebel2, and Katrin Schmitz6. (1) nomamed Schütze/Schuster GbR, Enterostomal Therapist, Kreuzacker 2, Harsum-Asel, Germany, (2) Hansemed GmbH, Stoma Care Nurse, Forstweg 26, Kiel, Germany, (3) Rehateam Nordwürtemberg, Stoma Care Nurse, Schornbacherweg 53, Schorndorf, Germany, (4) Sanitätshaus Keil GmbH, Stoma Care Nurse, Kreutzberger Ring 20, Wiesbaden, Germany, (5) CIK-IN, Stoma Care Nurse, Sudetenstrasse 40, Grossmehring, Germany, (6) Gesundheitszentrum Lang, Stoma Care Nurse and Health Economist, Krengelstrasse 116-118, Dinslaken, Germany

Background: The following issues have been identified as being related to quality of life when using a pouching system: peristomal skin disorders; concerns about leakage, odour and sleep interruptions; noise from and indiscreetness of the pouching system1.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a new 2-piece ostomy pouching system with closed-end pouches (system A) and to compare it to a reference system already known to the market (system B).

Methodology: 73 participants with a colostomy aged 63 ± 13 years (mean ± SD) participated in a study conducted in Germany at 8 home care centres.  Each participant evaluated 4-6 barriers of one pouching system and then evaluated 4-6 barriers of the other system in randomized order. Investigators visited the subjects three times during the study and filled in parts of a questionnaire (baseline characteristics, user patterns and skin evaluation). Participants filled in parts about product performance and safety. Answers were collected in terms of 3 or 5-point scales, e.g. from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon, Sign and students t-test (all paired) and Binomial test. The significance level was 5%.

Results: The new pouching system barrier was significantly more flexible (p<0.0005) and easier to remove (p=0.0005).  The outlet on the new pouch was significantly easier to clean and more secure than the reference pouch (p<0.0005). Significantly fewer participants were bothered about the pressure needed to apply the new pouch to the new barrier (p<0.0005).  There were less ballooning (p<0.0005) and decreased odour problems (p<0.0005) with the new pouch. The new system was preferred by 98% of the participants over the reference system (p<0.0005).

Conclusion: In this study the new 2-piece closed-end pouching system performed significantly better than the reference pouching system on all parameters relating the use of ostomy pouching systems to quality of life.