Methods: In an informal, non-clinical, tactile assessment conducted during the WOCN Society meeting in June of 2007, 389 wound care professionals evaluated the characteristics of a new non-adherent contact layer (Product A) and a non-adherent, silicone-based dressing (Product B). All products were unbranded and cut to a similar size of approximately 2 inches by 2 inches. Evaluations included: ease of removal from the skin, adherence to itself, and formation of a moist gel when exposed to a saline solution simulating wound exudate.

Results (Margin of error is 5%):
· Agreed that product was easy to remove from the skin (99% Product A, 21% Product)
· Agreed that product did not adhere to itself (99% Product A, 2% Product B)
· Agreed that product formed a moist gel when exposed to a saline solution (95% Product A, 5% Product B)
· Based on the properties evaluated in this tactile assessment, 98% of caregivers stated a purchase preference for Product A.

Conclusion: In this exercise, 95% of respondent wound care professionals, stated a preference for Product A based on perceived ease of use, suggesting appropriateness for a wide range of clinical applications.

*Product A was Restore Contact Layer with TRIACT Technology, Hollister Wound Care, LLC; Product B was a widely used silicon-based contact layer dressing.
References:

• Meaume S, etc. (2002). Br J Nurs 11 (16) (TVN Suppl): S42-3, S46-50
  
• Meaume S, etc. (2004). J Wound Care, 13(10), 409-413.
  
• Grohmann B, etc. (2007). Journal of Retailing 83 (2) 237-245.