Methods: 10 patients were sequentially identified whose wounds definitely needed debridement, but who could not be debrided sharply down to viable tissue, for a number of reasons. Honey gel* was applied to wounds with minimal to moderate drainage while the contact layer** was typically used for wounds with moderate to heavy drainage. In both cases, appropriate secondary dressings were used. Wound assessment including size measurements, photography, and the percentage determination of necrotic tissue versus viable (granulation and epithelial) tissue were made at each dressing change.
Results and Conclusion: Wound dimensions generally decreased, though in some cases, as not uncommon with autolytic debridement, the wound initially increased before reducing in size. The honey dressings reduced the extent of necrotic tissue, while also maintaining a moist wound environment. The differing rates of autolytic debridement were influenced by the age and type of wound along with the patient’s general medical condition. Given the diverse nature of these wounds, it is apparent that the use of Manuka honey dressings provide a valuable option to sharp debridement that is welcome following the removal of previously accessible and effective products such as papain/urea.