CT14-003 Self-management in long-term indwelling urinary catheter users

Tuesday, June 24, 2014: 5:25 PM
Mary H. Wilde, PhD, RN1, James M. McMahon, PhD1, Margaret V. McDonald, MSW2, Wan Tang, PhD3, Wenjuan Wang, PhD3, Judith Brasch, RN, MS1, Eileen Fairbanks, RN, MS, PNP1, Shivani Shah, MPH2, Feng Zhang, RN, BSN1 and Din Chen, PhD4, (1)School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, (2)Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, (3)Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, (4)School of Nursing and Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
Aims: The study was designed to determine whether a urinary catheter self-management intervention could 1) decrease catheter-related problems of urinary tract infection, blockage, accidental dislodgement of the catheter and their associated healthcare costs; and 2) improve catheter-related quality of life.

Design/methods: The study was a randomized single-blinded experimental design in New York state of 202 long-term, community-living, indwelling urinary catheter users, half in the self-management group and half in the control group receiving usual care. Self-reported data were obtained for both groups through an initial home visit interview and 6 bimonthly phone call interviews, in which participants kept a simple catheter calendar over 12 months of follow-up. The final sample was 150, for a 74% completion rate.

Results: The longitudinal GEE analyses for repeated measures indicated that there was a significantly positive (P= 0.017) decrease only in percent of blockage in the intervention group in the first 6 months of the study, but this effect did not last for 12 months. Comparisons of between and within group rates at intake, for the first 6 months, second 6 months, and full study of 12 months provided additional information and indicate that both groups improved over time for all catheter problems’ outcomes.  Catheter-related quality of life did not differ significantly for group comparisons at baseline, 6, or 12 months’ follow-up.

Conclusion: Both groups appeared to have improved during the study. A simple to use catheter problems’ calendar and the bimonthly interviews might have functioned like a modest form of a self-monitoring intervention for controls.  Intervention participants might have needed additional support/teaching from the study nurse beyond the 4 months’ timeframe for the intervention. Teaching self-monitoring skills to long-term urinary catheter users could help minimize catheter problems, and there might be additional benefit in promoting optimal and consistent fluid intake.