Methods: Retrospective de-identified electronic medical records from 2007-2013 were extracted from the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR). The USWR is a longitudinal observation database of chronic wounds from more than 100 HOPD wound centers in the U.S. A propensity score matching method was used to adjust for selection bias and to test for treatment effects between wounds treated with CCO versus MH.
Results: A total of 9,313 patients, 22,312 wounds, and 186,023 visits for VLU were identified. The majority of patients were female (51.9%) with an average age of 61.6 (SD=17.7). Approximately 21.3% had a history of hypertension, 8.3% had a history of venous insufficiency with diabetes. Mean baseline wound surface area was 7.9cm2 (SD=14.4). The average wound age at baseline was 8.5 months (SD=27.8) and average treatment duration was 2.9 months (SD=4.9). Of the 22,312 VLU, approximately 13.2% received CCO (n=2,954) and 2.2% received medicinal honey (n=495). VLU treated with medicinal honey were significantly more likely (p<0.0001) to be active and chronic after 60 days relative to wounds treated with CCO (13% versus 9%, respectively). Furthermore, VLU treated with CCO were significantly more likely (p<0.01) to achieve 100% granulation by the end of therapy compared to wounds treated with medicinal honey (30% versus 19%, respectively). Finally, VLU treated with CCO were significantly more likely (p<0.0001) to close by the end of therapy relative to wounds treated with MH (45% versus 31%, respectively).
Conclusion: Over the course of therapy VLU treated with CCO demonstrate greater clinical improvement with respect to granulation and closure than VLU treated with MH.