PI48 Nurse-Driven Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Prevent Pediatric Cardiac Pressure Injury

Lindyce Kulik, MS, RN, CWON, CCRN1, Jean Connor, PhD, RN, FAAN2, Dionne Graham, PhD3 and Patricia Hickey, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN2, (1)Cardiovascular Critical Care, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, (2)Cardiovascular and Critical Care Services, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, (3)Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
Background: Pediatric cardiac surgical patients develop pressure injury. Little is known about pressure injury in this vulnerable population.

Objective: Develop a standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP™) to describe pressure injury development in pediatric cardiac surgical patients and evaluate prevention strategies.

Methods: Using a novel quality improvement initiative1, and consensus approach, a nurse-driven pressure injury prevention SCAMP™ was developed with implementation upon patient admission. Data were recorded targeting specific nursing assessments and management based on pre-defined data statements and algorithms. Diversions from algorithms were recorded and analyzed.

Results: Data on 674 cardiac surgical patients were collected between May 2011-June 2012. In 5,918 patient days, 4,603 nursing skin assessments were completed in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) and Cardiac Inpatient Unit, representing 77% of expected assessments. Twenty-nine patients developed 30 pressure injuries: 70%, (21/30) device-related and 30% (9/30) immobility-related. Total pressure injury incidence was 4.4%: device-related 3.1% and immobility-related 1.3%. Most (62%) device-related pressure injury were airway-related: oral endotracheal tubes (9/21) and nasal endotracheal tubes (4/21). The occiput was the most common location for immobility-related injury. Most (40%) pressure injury was Stage 1, Stage 2 (26.7%), mucosal membrane pressure injury (26.7%), and deep tissue injury (6.7%). Majority (80%) of pressure injury occurred within 7 days of cardiac surgery with 90% identified in the CICU. The most common reported nursing diversion was frequency of repositioning, related to concern of the patient’s early postoperative status.

Conclusion: A nurse-driven SCAMP™ informed a program-based evaluation of nursing practice and patient outcomes. Review of practices highlighted opportunities to standardize and focus pressure injury prevention practices through program guidelines and ensure communication of patient vulnerabilities.