Method/Results:This mixed methods study examined 29 adult patients who were proned in MICU during 2014-2016. Using the SAOM method there were 21 patients, as compared to 8 using CM proning. Pressure injury occurrence was identified thru documentation from certified wound, ostomy, and continence nurses. Of those patients proned with the SAOM method, N=2 (9.5%) developed a HAPI compared to N=3 (37.5%) in the CM group. The primary admission diagnosis was acute respiratory failure in both groups (SAOM n=19, 90%; CM n=7, 87.5%). Of the risk factors examined, SAOM patients were hemodynamically more stable than CM (p=0.04, x2 (1) =3.04). Bowel management devices in the SAOM were n=19 (90%) and n=3 (37%) in the CM (p=.004, x2 (3) =13.08). A feasibility survey was analyzed with 24 responses reporting high confidence with the SAOM method. Common themes identified from the focus groups were safety, ability to implement sooner, and the lack of having to wait on delivery of a specialty product.
Conclusions:This study suggests the SAOM method is easy to use, readily accessible, and is a safe method in adult MICU patients. The SAOM method reduced HAPI development during this acute period in prone position.