GS04 The Effect of a Dynamic Alternating Micropressure Overlay in High Risk Cardiac Surgical Patients to Reduce Pressure Injuries

Sunday, June 23, 2019: 2:34 PM
Joy Pittman, PhD, ANP-BC, FNP-BC, CWOCN1, Karrie Bailey, RN2, Terrie Beeson, MSN RN CCRN ACNS-BC3, Deb Hall, BSN, RN, CNOR4, Dawn Horvath, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CNS-BC5, Laura Kaiser, RN, CNOR4, Emily Meister, BSN, RN, CCRN-CSC5, Anna Mills, MSN, RN5 and Jennifer Sweeney, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CDE2, (1)Wound Ostomy Continence, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, (2)Indiana University Health- Academic Health Center, Indianapolis, IN, (3)Indiana University Health, University Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, (4)Surgery, Indiana University Health- Academic Health Center, Indianapolis, IN, (5)Nursing, Indiana University Health- Academic Health Center, Indianapolis, IN
Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) continue to occur especially in critical care patients. HAPI rates were highest in our critically ill cardiothoracic patients and were Operating Room (OR)-related. A new dynamic micropressure overlay (DMO) designed for OR and critical care to prevent pressure injuries was identified as a potential prevention strategy. The purpose of our study was to examine the effect of this DMO on HAPI in the cardiothoracic patient.  

Using a pre/post comparative design, a DMO was placed on OR and critical care surfaces of patients who had prolonged cardiovascular procedures and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Ventricular Assist Device, and/or Heart or Lung transplant. Data collected included: HAPI rates, related costs and staff satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data.

Our results demonstrated a reduction of OR-related HAPI over 6 months from 8/71 (8.5%) to 0/147 (0%). This resulted in a OR-related HAPI cost avoidance of $368,000 (HAPI X 8 @ $46,000); when annualized, $1,472,000 cost avoidance is projected. OR staff satisfaction surveys demonstrated positive results with a mean of 3.85 (1-4). In Critical Care, 12% (8 /7) HAPI incidence reduction was noted and incidence density decreased from 3.57 to 3.24. No improvement in HAPI monthly prevalence was noted in critical care over the 6 months. However, during the 6 months there were many high-acuity patients in the unit which did not meet inclusion criteria thus influencing the prevalence rates. Staff satisfaction mean was 2.95 (1-4) but staff preferred the overlay compared to the usual care (fluid emersion) surface. A cost savings of 22% was found in critical care using the DMO compared to usual care.

The findings of this study suggest a reduction of HAPI’s and cost savings can be realized utilizing the DMO. This intervention offers an additional pressure injury prevention option for the immobile patient undergoing surgery.