R04 Incontinence and hospital-acquired pressure injury: A multi-center cross-sectional study

Manuela Hoedl, Institute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, Vit Blanar, Department of Nursing, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic, Yufitriana Amir, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia and Christa Lohrmann, Department of Nursing, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
Background: Incontinence (INC), whether urinary, fecal or double incontinence, is known as one associated factor for the development of pressure injuries (PI)1,2. Several descriptive studies are available that focus on INC and PI. However, the exploration of the association between INC and hospital-acquired PI through correlational analysis is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the association between INC and hospital-acquired PI through regression analysis.

Methods: The 2017 Austrian version of the ‘Prevalence Measurement of Care Problems’ (including also the Care Dependency Scale), an annually repeated cross-sectional survey, was used. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used for secondary data analysis.

Results: Thirty-seven Austrian hospitals including 209 wards participated. Of all patients available at the measurement day (N=4074), 2955 took part in the study, mainly from internal and surgical wards. The majority was female, on average 66 years old and completely care-independent. About every fifth person was INC (20.1%) and the hospital-acquired PI prevalence was 1.3%. Of those persons who were INC, 3.9% had a hospital-acquired PI (23/595). We could not identify a statistically significant association between INC and hospital-acquired PIs. However, we could identify a statistically significant association between the degree of care dependency and spinal cord injuries with hospital-acquired PI.

Discussion/Conclusion: Our results indicate no association between INC and hospital-acquired PIs. One explanation could be the small sample, with only 600 persons suffering from INC and only 38 from a hospital-acquired PI. Further research on a larger data set on an international level is required.