OA04 Medical Device Related Pressure Injuries in Infants and Children:  Findings and Implications of the Braden QD Study

Tuesday, June 25, 2019: 11:44 AM
Judith J. Stellar, MSN, CRNP, PPCNP-BC, CWOCN, Nursing & General Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, Natalie Hasbani, MPH, Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, Lindyce Kulik, MS, RN, CWON, CCRN, Cardiovascular Critical Care, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, Stacey Shelley, RN, MSN, MBA-HCM, Wound/Ostomy, Intermountain Healthcare, SLC, UT, Sandy Quigley, MSN, RN, CPNP-PC, CWOCN, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, David Wypij, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA and Martha A. Q. Curley, RN, PhD, FAAN, Research Institute/UPENN School of Nursing, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Purpose: To explore medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPI) in the pediatric acute care setting; specifically, identify medical devices in use, current device-related pressure injury prevention strategies, devices associated with MDRPI, and the location and stage of MDRPI.

Study design: Secondary analysis of MDRPI data from the Braden QD study1 an IRB-approved, multicenter, prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were hospitalized patients, preterm to 21 years, on bedrest for at least 24H with a medical device in place. Two nursing teams, blinded to each other’s assessment, worked in tandem to score pressure injury risk and evaluate medical devices in place. Observations occurred 8 times over a maximum of 4 weeks or until discharge.

Results: A total of 625 subjects were enrolled of which 14 (2%) developed immobility-related HAPI and 42 (7%) developed MDRPI. Children 1 month to 8 years developed most MDRPI (49%). Half of those with MDRPI were cardiovascular patients. Functional impairment (Pediatric Overall Performance Category>1), requiring ICU support, and being malnourished (overweight or underweight according to CDC defined body mass index standard scores) were significantly associated with MDRPI (p<0.05 for all variables). The most common medical devices on study day 1 were vascular devices (27%), followed by external monitoring (26%), securement/supportive (8%) and respiratory devices (8%). About 65% of medical devices identified on day 1 were noted to have at least one prevention practice in place. Respiratory devices had the highest rate of MDRPI development (6.19 per 1000 device-days), followed by immobilizers, GI tubes/drains, and external monitoring devices.

Conclusion: MDRPI constitutes the majority of HAPI in the pediatric population. Pressure injury risk assessments should therefore include medical device-related risk. In addition, details of MDRPI such as device type, and location and stage of MDRPI should be monitored in order to design targeted interventions for device-specific injury prevention.